Andor, L. (2020) ‘Cohesion and Stabilisation in the Future MFF’, in B. Laffan and A. de Feo (eds) EU Financing for Next Decade Beyond the MFF 2021-2027 and the Next Generation EU, Florence: EUI.
Bachtler, J., C. Mendez, F. Wishlade (2013), EU Cohesion Policy and European integration. The dynamics of EU budget and regional policy reform, Aldershot: Ashgate.
Bachtler, J., P. Berkowitz, S. Hardy, T. Muravska (Eds 2017) EU Cohesion Policy Reassessing performance and direction, Routledge.
Bachtler, J. and C. Mendez (2020), Cohesion and the EU budget: Is conditionality undermining solidarity?, in: Coman, R., Crespy, A. and V.A. Schmidt: Governance and politics in the post-crisis Union, Cambridge University Press, pp 121-139.
Bachtler, J. and C. Mendez (2021), Recovery and cohesion: Ambitious objectives, challenging implementation, EoRPA Report 21/2 to the 42nd annual meeting of the EoRPA Regional Policy Research Consortium, October 2021, European Policy Research Centre, Glasgow/Delft: University of Strathclyde Publishing.
Bachtler, J. and C. Mendez (2020) Navigating stormy waters: crises and cohesion policy beyond 2027, European Regional Policy Research Consortium, Report 23/3.
Barbero, J., M. Christensen, A. Rodríguez-Pose, A. Conte, S. Salotti (2023) ‘Improving Government Quality in the Regions of the EU and its System-Wide Benefits for Cohesion Policy’, JCMS 2023 61/1, pp. 38–57.
Barca, F. (2009), An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations, Independent Report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy, Brussels.
Bekker, S. (2021) ‘The EU’s Recovery and Resilience Facility: A Next Phase in EU Socioeconomic Governance?’, Politics and Governance, 9/3.
Begg, I. et a. (2022) The next revision of the financial regulation and the EU budget galaxy, Brussels: European Parliament. The next revision of the financial regulation and the EU Budget Galaxy - How to safeguard and strengthen budgetary principles and parliamentary oversight (europa.eu).
Crescenzia, R., M. Giua (2020) ‘One or many Cohesion Policies of the European Union? On the differential economic impacts of Cohesion Policy across member states’, Regional Studies, 54/1. Pp. 10–20.
Darvas, Z., G. Wolff (2018) ‘Rethinking the European union’s post-Brexit budget priorities’, Policy Brief, Bruegel.
ECA (European Court of Auditors) (2013) Taking stock of ‘single audit’ and the Commission’s reliance on the work of national audit authorities in cohesion’, Luxembourg: Special Report 16. link
ECA (2014) Gaps, overlaps and challenges: a landscape review of EU accountability and public audit arrangements, Luxembourg. Gaps, overlaps and challenges: a landscape review of EU accountability and public audit arrangements (europa.eu).
ECA (2017) The Commission’s negotiation of 2014-2020 Partnership Agreements and programs in Cohesion: spending more targeted on Europe 2020 priorities, but increasingly complex arrangements to measure performance’, Luxembourg: Special Report 2. The Commission’s negotiation of 2014-2020 Partnership Agreements and programs in Cohesion: spending more targeted on Europe 2020 priorities, but increasingly complex arrangements to measure performance (europa.eu)
ECA (2018a) Simplification in post-2020 delivery of Cohesion Policy, Briefing Paper, Luxembourg. link
ECA (2018b), Opinion concerning the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down, Luxembourg: Opinion 6/2018. Official Journal of the European Union (europa.eu).
ECA (2019) Delivering performance in Cohesion, Briefing Paper, Luxembourg. link
ECA (2021a) Performance-based financing in Cohesion policy: worthy ambitions, but obstacles remained in the 2014-2020 period, Luxembourg ECA Special report 24/2021. Special report 24/2021: Performance-based financing in Cohesion policy: worthy ambitions, but obstacles remained in the 2014-2020 period | European Court of Auditors (europa.eu).
ECA (2021b) Regularity of spending in EU Cohesion policy: Commission discloses annually a minimum estimated level of error that is not final, Luxembourg: Special Report 26/2021. Special Report 26/2021: Regularity of spending in EU Cohesion policy (europa.eu).
ECA (2022) Annual reports concerning the 2021 financial year, Luxembourg: ECA. link
ECA (2023a) 2022 Annual reports, Luxembourg: ECA. link
ECA (2023b), Reforming the EU’s economic governance: Opportunities with risks and challenges, Luxembourg: ECA. link
ECA (2023c) NGEU debt management at the Commission: An encouraging start, but further alignment with best practice needed, Luxembourg Special Report 16/2023. link
ECA (2023d) Adapting cohesion policy rules to respond to COVID-19 Funds used more flexibly, but reflection needed on cohesion policy as a crisis response tool, Luxembourg: Special Report 2/2023. Special report 02/2023: Adapting cohesion policy rules to respond to COVID-19 | European Court of Auditors (europa.eu).
European Commission (2011), The added value of the EU budget, Brussels: Commission staff working paper.
European Commission (2021a) Common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum and Migration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Border Management and Visa Policy, OJ L 231, 30.6.2021, Brussels. EUR-Lex - 32021R1060 - EN - EUR-Lex (europa.eu).
European Commission (2021b), Cohesion in Europe towards 2050. Eighth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion, Luxembourg. Inforegio - Eighth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion (europa.eu).
European Commission (2023) Decision setting up the group of high-level specialists on the future of cohesion policy, C(2023) 739 final. link
European Commission (2023) Mid-term revision of the Multiannual Financial Framework 2021 – 2027, COM(2023) 336 final. link
European Economic and Social Committee (2020a), Cohesion policy as fundamental pillar for bringing the EU closer to its citizens and for reducing disparities among EU regions and inequalities among people - The views of organised civil society for the programming period 2021-2027, Brussels.
European Parliament (2020b) Discharge procedure for the EU Budget Political scrutiny of budgetary implementation, Discharge procedure for the EU Budget (europa.eu).
European Parliament (2022) Single Audit Approach – Root Causes of the Weaknesses in the Work of the Member States’ Managing and Audit Authorities, Directorate-General for Internal Policies, Policy Department D, Budgetary Affairs.
European Parliament (2023), Report on possibilities to increase the reliability of audits and controls by national authorities in shared management, Brussels: EP. A9-0297/2023.
Fuest C. and Pisani-Ferry F. (2019), A Primer on Developing European Public Goods. A Primer on Developing European Public Goods | Publication | Econpol Europe.
Schout, A., D. Gros (2023), Scenarios for the Euro: A realistic Perspective Between Hope and Fear, Ceps: Policy Paper (at the request of the EP/ECR). Via the European Parliament: Scenarios for the Eurozone // ECR Group. Via CEPS: Scenarios for the Eurozone – CEPS.
Henriques, C., C. Viseu (Eds, 2022), EU Cohesion Policy Implementation Evaluation Challenges and Opportunities, Springer.
Hunter, A. (2023) Addressing Cohesion Policy’s identity crisis in a changing European Union, Brussels: EPC.
Levy, R. (2002) ‘Modernising EU Program Management’, Public Policy and Administration, 17/1.
Mérand, F. (2021) The political Commissioner, Cambridge University Press.
Metcalfe, L. (1981) ‘Designing Precarious Partnerships’, in Nystrom, P.C. and Starbuck, W.H. (eds.) Handbook of Organizational Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 503-530.
Metcalfe, L. (1992). After 1992: Can the Commission Manage Europe? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 51 (1): 117-130.
Morgan, G. (1986) Images of organizations, London: Sage.
OECD (2016) Supreme Audit Institutions and Good Governance: Oversight, Insight and Foresight, Paris: OECD.
Petzhold, W. (2022) ‘The 2021 reform of EU cohesion policy’, in: H. Heinelt and S. Münch (eds), The EU at a crossroads. EU policies after the negotiations of the Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-2027, Edgar Elgar.
Pierre, J., J. de Fine Licht (2019) ‘How do supreme audit institutions manage their autonomy and impact? A comparative analysis’, Journal of European Public Policy, 26/2, 226–245.
Rubio, E. (2011), The “added value” in EU budgetary debates: one concept, four meanings, Paris: Notre Europe.
Schout, A., I. Blankesteijn (2020) ‘Diagnosing enforcement of EU border control’, Clingendael Policy Paper, 2020. link
Schout, A. (2021a), Europese integratie en Europese samenwerking: als meer van hetzelfde niet werkt, Rede uitgesproken bij de aanvaarding van het ambt van bijzonder hoogleraar European Public Administration aan de Faculteit der Managementwetenschappen van de Radboud Universiteit.
Schout, A. (2021b) ‘The EU’s recovery and resilience facility as economic enforcement tool: The RRF as administrative subsidiarity’, Clingendael policy paper. The RRF as administrative subsidiarity | Clingendael.
Schout, A. (2022), EU Subsidiarity as an Antidote to Centralisation and Inefficiency, Brussels: Martens Centre. EU Subsidiarity as an Antidote to Centralisation and Inefficiency | Martens Centre.
Schout, A., A. van Riel (2022), The state of economic convergence in the Eurozone: Two decades of monetary union and economic governance, Policy Paper written for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to support the Dutch input on SGP reform. The state of economic convergence in the Eurozone | Clingendael.
Schout A., L. Molthof, S. Hollander (2022), The Multiannual Financial Framework: The search for flexibility and recognised effectiveness. Strategy Paper for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The Hague: Clingendael. link
Tibor, D. (2017) ‘EU added value - a categorical imperative for EU action?’, ECA Journal, 20_03.pdf.
Weick KE, Quinn RE (1999) ‘Organizational change and development’, Annual Review of Psychology, 50:361–386.